SE251:Session3Group8
| Assessment criteria | Score |
|---|---|
| The session content is relevant to the course | 5 |
| The session has been a useful aid to your own learning | 4 |
| The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented | 5 |
| You have learnt something new from the session | 5 |
Justification for the above scores
The group clearly understood the complexities of the assignment. They demonstrated some interesting improvements to the basic program. Alot of it was a bit repetitive as I had already strugled through the assignment. I hadnt done the optional part of the assignment like most people so I found that really interesting.
One aspect of the session that was particularly good
The explanation of the optional part was very good. I learnt alot. I also like how they improved the basic program by removing the typeDef variable.
One part of the session that could have been improved
It was a little boring as we have already done the assignment and it was repitition but thats to be expected. Very good otherwise.
Peer assessors present
Sutirtha Basak (sbas046)
Shrikkanth Sreedharan (ssre005)
Braedon Fraser Vickers (bvic005)
David John Olsen (dols008)
Han lin (hlin079)
Jonathan James Andrew Smith (jsmi233)