SE251:Session4Group7

From Marks Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search




Assessment criteria Score
The session content is relevant to the course 4
The session has been a useful aid to your own learning 4
The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented 4
You have learnt something new from the session 4


Justification for the above scores

  • Question 1: Was a good quesiton, however the difference between <Type>MethodName() and MethodName<Type>() was not really addressed. Hong Yul did this later however.
  • Question 2: Bit of a random question, hard to follow and it didn't help that it wasn't actually run. Bit of a shame cos it was promising, I mean its pokemon! (Actually I hate pokemon, but I welcome any peers questions that think outside the box)
  • Question 3: Both makeYouFat and incrYourSize seem like method names, so naturally it was a tad confusing. Question was not that clear and the explanation was a bit thin, but the answer was obvious and useful in the end.
  • Question Set: Very neat exercise, again these sessions really thrive on something different! The best thing was that it all got demonstrated firsthand on the big screen. Good questions, well explained, very useful. Two thumbs up from me.


One aspect of the session that was particularly good

Definately the question set issued out at the end.

One part of the session that could have been improved

Questions two and three were a bit weak.

Assessed By

Varun Prasad (vpra017)

Peer assessors present

Joon Ha Park (jpar277)

Varun Prasad (vpra017)

Archana Pratthi (apra102)

Matthew Scott Spencer (mspe044)

Tom Yige Lou (tlou006)