SE251:Session6Group7

From Marks Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Assessment criteria Score
The session content is relevant to the course 5
The session has been a useful aid to your own learning 4
The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented 4
You have learnt something new from the session 4


Justification for the above scores

  • Task 1: It was well presented and explained, I felt they may have included too much info in their diagram.
  • Task 2: It was easy to explain.
  • Task 3: They had an error with the width of their Gem Shape. Which was cleared out with the help of a discussion.
  • Task 4: They forgot to set the colour back to black from red after the shape hit the sides so the border of the normal shape changed colour from black to red.
  • Task 5: @_@ so epileptic lol

One aspect of the session that was particularly good

Slides were used to aid in explanations but then they switched over to Eclipse to show examples.

One part of the session that could have been improved

Speak up!

Assessed By

Joon Ha Park (jpar277)

Peer assessors present

Joon Ha Park (jpar277)

Varun Prasad (vpra017)

Archana Pratthi (apra102)

Matthew Scott Spencer (mspe044)

Tom Yige Lou (tlou006)