SE251:Session6Group8
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Editing SE251:Session5Group6 - SE Wiki
| Assessment criteria | Score |
|---|---|
| The session content is relevant to the course | 5 |
| The session has been a useful aid to your own learning | 5 |
| The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented | 4 |
| You have learnt something new from the session | 4 |
Justification for the above scores
- Postmortem on assignment 3.
- Different type of solution can be seen.
- Certain codes could be abbreviated to do the same thing.
- The optional task was pretty interesting.
One aspect of the session that was particularly good
- The slide show was a good touch, due to boredom at repeatedly looking at eclipse.
One part of the session that could have been improved
- one of the group members made an error for the diagram of gem shape.
Peer assessors present
Shrikkanth Sreedharan (ssre005)
Braedon Fraser Vickers (bvic005)
David John Olsen (dols008)
Han lin (hlin079)
Sutirtha Basak (sbas046)
Jonathan James Andrew Smith (jsmi233)