SE251:Session7Group2

From Marks Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Assessment criteria Score
The session content is relevant to the course 4
The session has been a useful aid to your own learning 5
The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented 4
You have learnt something new from the session 5


What was done well

  • The powerpoint explaining the principles behind NestingShape was very thorough and well-explained.
  • The recursive function was very interesting.

What could have been done differently

  • The first speaker spoke far to quietly and could not be heard.
  • The path function for NestingShape was gone over three times, yet there was no discussion on the add and remove functions.
  • It was disappointing that more was not done to relate the first task to the template method which was used to implement it.

What was interesting

  • Seeing some more of the optional tasks from BounceI.

Peer assessors present

Shu Fang Huang (shua066)

Laura Joan Laycock (llay008)

Hussain Al-Saady (hals016)

Mohammad Abdulnasir Abdullatif (mabd065)