SE251:Session 1 report by group 4
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Assessment criteria | Score |
|---|---|
| The session content is relevant to the course | 4 |
| The session has been a useful aid to your own learning | 4 |
| The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented | 4 |
| You have learnt something new from the session | 4 |
Justification for the above scores
The group presented a good of questions, they contained basic and complex JAVA questions. They were good as they reminded us of some basic skills needed for programing
One aspect of the session that was particularly good
The feedback asked from Group 1 was quite good, it helped clarify any doubts we had
One part of the session that could have been improved
The execution of the code and the answers were hard to follow and notepad had to be opened so that the answer options could be seen. This could be improved next time so time could be spent on the question instead.
Peer assessors present
Krishant Lodhia (klod004)
Arshdeep Singh (asin185)
Haroun Barazanchi (hbar055)
Anushka Lakmal Nanayakkara (anan019)
Qi-Shan Lim (qlim001)